<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Idle Analytics&#187; Linguistic Pet Peeves</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.idleanalytics.com/category/linguistic-pet-peeves/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.idleanalytics.com</link>
	<description>Semi-scientific thoughts, explanations, and musings on the world</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Dec 2013 05:26:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.40</generator>
	<item>
		<title>LPP 28</title>
		<link>http://www.idleanalytics.com/2005/08/08/lpp-28/</link>
		<comments>http://www.idleanalytics.com/2005/08/08/lpp-28/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Aug 2005 14:59:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jessica]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Linguistic Pet Peeves]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.idleanalytics.com/index.php/2005/08/08/lpp-28/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to a recent press release: UC Riverside now has more than 17,000 students, 2,000 staff members and nearly more than 800 faculty members. Um. Nearly more than? So, exactly 800, then? Proofread, people--always proofread.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.idleanalytics.com/2005/08/08/lpp-28/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>LPP 27</title>
		<link>http://www.idleanalytics.com/2005/06/21/lpp-27/</link>
		<comments>http://www.idleanalytics.com/2005/06/21/lpp-27/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2005 01:11:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jessica]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Linguistic Pet Peeves]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.idleanalytics.com/index.php/2005/06/21/lpp-27/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Infinitesimal It doesn't mean a lot. It means tiny. Almost infinitely tiny. Seriously wee.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.idleanalytics.com/2005/06/21/lpp-27/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>LPP 25</title>
		<link>http://www.idleanalytics.com/2005/04/22/lpp-25/</link>
		<comments>http://www.idleanalytics.com/2005/04/22/lpp-25/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Apr 2005 17:10:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jessica]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Linguistic Pet Peeves]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.idleanalytics.com/index.php/2005/04/22/lpp-25/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Pitchy Ok, so this isn't really something most people say, but it is something those idiot American Idol judges say all the time. The thing is, pitchy is a word, it just doesn't mean anything close to what they're using it for. According to Dictionary.com, pitchy means Full of or covered with pitch. Resembling pitch &#8230; </p><p><a class="more-link block-button" href="http://www.idleanalytics.com/2005/04/22/lpp-25/">Continue reading &#187;</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.idleanalytics.com/2005/04/22/lpp-25/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>LPP 24</title>
		<link>http://www.idleanalytics.com/2005/03/21/lpp-24/</link>
		<comments>http://www.idleanalytics.com/2005/03/21/lpp-24/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Mar 2005 20:54:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jessica]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Linguistic Pet Peeves]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.idleanalytics.com/index.php/2005/03/21/lpp-24/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Anymore It really sounds weird and wrong when someone uses the word "anymore" with a positive, e.g. "I always go to the Albertson's on Ironwood anymore." This is because that is simply not what that word is supposed to do--"anymore" means something used to be the case, but now isn't. Anymore is meant to be &#8230; </p><p><a class="more-link block-button" href="http://www.idleanalytics.com/2005/03/21/lpp-24/">Continue reading &#187;</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.idleanalytics.com/2005/03/21/lpp-24/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>LPP 23</title>
		<link>http://www.idleanalytics.com/2005/03/14/lpp-23/</link>
		<comments>http://www.idleanalytics.com/2005/03/14/lpp-23/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Mar 2005 17:25:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jessica]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Linguistic Pet Peeves]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.idleanalytics.com/index.php/2005/03/14/lpp-23/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["" Quotation marks are not to be used to emphasize something. Because they don't do that. If a sign says "Saturday: 'HUGE SALE'" it makes me think, so what, it's not really a huge sale? Maybe it's not a sale at all? It's just a "sale"? Because quotation marks can indicate insincerity, as a stand &#8230; </p><p><a class="more-link block-button" href="http://www.idleanalytics.com/2005/03/14/lpp-23/">Continue reading &#187;</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.idleanalytics.com/2005/03/14/lpp-23/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>LPP 22</title>
		<link>http://www.idleanalytics.com/2005/03/09/lpp-22/</link>
		<comments>http://www.idleanalytics.com/2005/03/09/lpp-22/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Mar 2005 07:07:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jessica]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Linguistic Pet Peeves]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.idleanalytics.com/index.php/2005/03/09/lpp-22/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["Mute" points More nonsense. The word is moot. Not mute. Think about it---what could a mute point possibly be? How many leaps of logic does it take to rationalize a mute point? Answer: lots. And that's never a good thing. Plus moot is more fun to say. Moot moot moot.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.idleanalytics.com/2005/03/09/lpp-22/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>LPP 21</title>
		<link>http://www.idleanalytics.com/2005/03/08/lpp-21/</link>
		<comments>http://www.idleanalytics.com/2005/03/08/lpp-21/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2005 05:20:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jessica]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Linguistic Pet Peeves]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.idleanalytics.com/index.php/2005/03/08/lpp-21/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Criteria The word criteria is plural. One of the members of a set of criteria is a criterion. Yeah, that's about it for that one.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.idleanalytics.com/2005/03/08/lpp-21/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>LPP 20</title>
		<link>http://www.idleanalytics.com/2005/03/07/lpp-20/</link>
		<comments>http://www.idleanalytics.com/2005/03/07/lpp-20/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Mar 2005 20:52:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jessica]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Linguistic Pet Peeves]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.idleanalytics.com/index.php/2005/03/07/lpp-20/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[No really, I'm serious about that I/me thing It is fortunate that the whole English-speaking world doesn't read our blog, because then Verizon would find out that we're running a server and be unhappy with us. It is unfortunate, however, because seemingly 90% of people don't know what to use I and when me. If &#8230; </p><p><a class="more-link block-button" href="http://www.idleanalytics.com/2005/03/07/lpp-20/">Continue reading &#187;</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.idleanalytics.com/2005/03/07/lpp-20/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>LPP 19</title>
		<link>http://www.idleanalytics.com/2005/03/05/lpp-19/</link>
		<comments>http://www.idleanalytics.com/2005/03/05/lpp-19/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Mar 2005 01:44:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jessica]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Linguistic Pet Peeves]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.idleanalytics.com/index.php/2005/03/05/lpp-19/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Vagaries/Vagueness, suggested by Jason I have not encountered this myself, but find it damn funny. Evidently someone said something about the vagaries of email--which just doesn't make any sense at all. A vagary is an eccentric notion or behavior: email itself has neither. An email conversation, I suppose, could contain vagaries. Vagueness, obviously, is a &#8230; </p><p><a class="more-link block-button" href="http://www.idleanalytics.com/2005/03/05/lpp-19/">Continue reading &#187;</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.idleanalytics.com/2005/03/05/lpp-19/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>LPP 18</title>
		<link>http://www.idleanalytics.com/2005/02/26/lpp-18/</link>
		<comments>http://www.idleanalytics.com/2005/02/26/lpp-18/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Feb 2005 05:54:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jessica]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Linguistic Pet Peeves]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.idleanalytics.com/index.php/2005/02/26/lpp-18/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Affect/Effect Affect is (always) a verb. Effect is (usually) a noun. Something that affects you has an effect on you. You can effect change, although you probably can't affect change--change is inevitable. Well, you may be able to slow it down sometimes. Anyway. The idea is, in general, you will only see the effects of &#8230; </p><p><a class="more-link block-button" href="http://www.idleanalytics.com/2005/02/26/lpp-18/">Continue reading &#187;</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.idleanalytics.com/2005/02/26/lpp-18/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
